ACTICOAT has proven highly effective against burn wound infections.
Early application can heal wounds faster22-24, improving your patient’s comfort and quality of life.
|
|
 |
Infection rate reduced by 80%25 |
 |
A 90% reduction in the use of antibiotics25 |
 |
A significant reduction in the need for skin grafts or other surgical procedures22, 26-28 |
Proactive burn wound treatment.
Prophylactic use can provide an antimicrobial barrier, following removal of necrotic or heavily infected tissue, for:
- Deep partial thickness burns: slows wound colonisation before definitive surgery29
- Superficial partial thickness burns: prevents wound progression and aids epithelialisation22
ACTICOAT can save costs and alleviate staff workloads.
|
40% reduced cost for burn wound dressings, when compared to alternative dressings*30 |
 |
Length of hospital stay reduced by up to 4.75 days29 |
Overall average total cost per patient treatment is up to 27% lower with ACTICOAT, when compared to other dressings26, 28, 31-34 |
 |
ACTICOAT can be used in conjunction with:
- VERSAJET◊ for improved debridement.
- INTRASITE◊ where additional moisture is required35-36
- ALLEVYN◊ as an effective secondary dressing37-39
|
For more challenging burn wounds, our PICO◊and RENASYS◊ products can provide Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) for up to 3 days when used in conjunction with ACTICOAT.
Get Closer To Zero infections in wound management
|
Contact us for advice on product selection for any specific patient requirements.
*£4,000 less than MepilexTM Ag, and £2,500 less than AquacelTM Ag
References
1. Wright et al (1998) ‘Wound management in an era of increasing bacterial antibiotic resistance: A role for topical silver treatment’, American Journal of Infection Control: 26(6):572-577.
2. Wright et al (1998) 'Efficacy of topical silver against fungal burn wound pathogens', American Journal of Infection Control (1999); 27(4): 344-350.
3. Driffield, K; ACTICOAT Flex 3 has antimicrobial activity in 30 minutes, Data on file 0810018, Smith & Nephew.
4. Driffield, K; ACTICOAT Flex 7 has antimicrobial activity in 30 minutes, Data on file 0810014, Smith & Nephew.
5. Gago et al (2008). A comparison of Three Silver - containing Dressings in the Treatment of Infected, Chronic Wounds 20(10): 273-278.
6. Newton (2010) Reducing MRSA bacteraemias associated with wounds. Wounds UK, Vol 6, No 1
6. Westaim Report Ref: # 971030 'The Antimicrobial Activity of Westaim's ACTICOAT Silver Coated Dressing against Clinically Relevant Organisms over an Extended Period of Time'.
8. Driffield, K; Antimicrobial Activity of ACTICOAT Flex 3 against a Broad Spectrum of Wound Pathogens, Data on File reference 0810016.
9. Newton (2010) Reducing MRSA bacteraemias associated with wounds. Wounds UK, Vol 6, No 1
10. Sibbald et al (2001) A screening evaluation of an ionised nanocrystalline silver dressing in chronic wound care. Ostomy Wound management 47 (10), 38-4.
11. Selcuk (2012) Comparison of the antibacterial effect of silver. Burns 38: 1204-1209.
12. Chopra (2007) Increasing use of silver-based products. Jnl. Anti Chem. 17. Strohal (2005). Nanocrystalline silver dressings. Jul Hospital 226-230
13. Upton, D (2010) Pain and stress as contributors to delayed wound healing. Wound Practice and Research.
14. Driffield, K; Antimicrobial activity of ACTICOAT Flex 7 against a broad spectrum of wound pathogens, Data on file 0810012, Smith & Nephew.
15. Driffield, K; Antimicrobial activity of ACTICOAT Flex 7 dressings in a seven-day repeat challenge, Data on file 0810013, Smith & Nephew.
16. Driffield, K; Antimicrobial Activity of ACTICOAT Flex 3 against a Broad Spectrum of Wound Pathogens, Data on File reference 0810016.
17. Driffield, K; Antimicrobial activity of ACTICOAT Flex 3 in a three-day repeat challenge, Data on file 0810017, Smith & Nephew.
18. Westaim (Sherritt) Report Ref: 93/001 'Broad Spectrum Efficacy'.
19. Westaim Report Ref. #010322 ‘Seven Day Efficacy of ACTICOAT 7 Dressings Against Multiple Organisms’.
20. Daubney, L: Silver Release Testing of ACTICOAT Flex 7 Dressings. Report reference DS/08/062/R2.
21. Daubney, L: Silver Release Testing of ACTICOAT Flex 3 Dressings. Report reference DS/08/078/R2.
22. Cuttle L et al., (2007) A retrospecc cohort. Burns; 33 (6): 701-7 7.
23. Huang (2007) A randomised comparative. Burns. 33: 161-166.
24. Demling and Desanti (2002) The rate of re-epithialization.
25. Data on File Report Reference 1609015 dated August 2016. ACTICOAT™ and ACTICOAT Flex 3 when used in conjunction with ALLEVYN™ Gentle Border using log reduction methodology against P.aeruginosa and MRSA.
26. Peters and Vercher (2006) Healing at. Jnl Burn Care & Res Vol27. No 2.
27. Tonkin and Wood (2006) Nanocrystalline Silver. Vol 13. No 4.
28. Muangman (2006) Comparison of efficacy. J Med Assoc Vol89 No7.
29. Fong (2005) A silver coated dressing. Burns 31: 562-567.
30. Leo Nherera. Cost-effectiveness analysis of antimicrobials in the management of superficial and deep partial thickness burns. Health Economics Manager, Smith & Nephew.
31. Strand (2010) Ann-Burns-and-Fire-Disasters-23-182.
32. Nheera (2015) Quantifying the cost savings. SAWC Poster.
33. Silver (2007) A silver coated. Am Burn Assoc. 715.
34. Cheng (2004) A tale of two dressings. Queensland.
35. Data on File Report 0305001 In-Vitro Assessment of The Compatibility of ACTICOAT* And INTRASITE* Gel Dressings May 2003.
36. Data on file report 0403006 Bio-activity of ACTICOAT™ when used with INTRASITE™ Gel March 2014.
37. File Report Reference 1609015 dated August 2016. ACTICOAT™ and ACTICOAT Flex 3 when used in conjunction with ALLEVYN™ Gentle Border using log reduction methodology against P.aeruginosa and MRSA.
38. Data on File Report Reference 1610016 dated October 2016. ACTICOAT™ and ACTICOAT Flex 3 when used in conjunction with ALLEVYN™ Classic range of dressings: A review of clinical data.
39. Data on File Report Reference 1610017 dated October 2016. ACTICOAT™ and ACTICOAT Flex 3 when used in conjunction with ALLEVYN™ LIFE: A review of clinical data.
40. West P and Gunning P (2006) Visualisation of silver levels in 2 silver dressings using scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray microanalysis. Poster at SAWC meeting San Antonio.
41. Woodmansey (2006) A visual demonstration of the antimicrobial efficacy of silver-based dressings against key pathogenic bacteria using confocal laser scanning microscopy.
42. Roberts (2008) Use of interventional approaches to controlling healthcare-acquired infections in wounds. The role of silver, Journal of Wound Technology, No.2: 58-60.